AlisonW - The .com test site

This site is currently being redeveloped. Although it will work fine it will continue to look terrible for a while yet. Sorry!

2009-06-05 - 13:15:00 - by AlisonW - Topic: UK-Politics: Westminster |

Repeatedly one hears political commentators exclaiming that Gordon Brown has "no mandate" to be the Prime Minister given that he wasn't the leader of his party at the time of the General Election. A few moments ago William Hague said it again on a television interview on the BBC.

Every time I hear this I want to scream out that people should really learn about the form of electoral democracy we have in this country. Unlike the USA or France, for example, we do not directly elect our political leader. We have representational democracy where each constituency elects a representative to the national parliament at Westminster. It is they who appoint a Prime Minister from amongst their number; usually the leader of the largest party. If that individual resigns – like Harold Wilson – or is removed by their colleagues – like Margaret Thatcher – their replacement needs no "new mandate from the country" as they were never elected by 'the country'. The only people who elect the PM are, in one sense, the electorate of their constituency which elected them to Parliament in the first place!

Major, Callaghan, and Brown took over as PM by virtue of our political system and had every right to continue in post without 'getting permission' from anyone else, least of all a General election. And being the leader of one's party at the time of an election doesn't always mean getting the top the next day either. The former Greater London Council was a body elected in a similar manner to Westminster on the opposite side of the Thames, yet in the election on 7 May 1981 – which Labour, under the leadership of Andrew McIntosh narrowly won – saw the coming to power of Ken Livingstone as he challenged and beat McIntosh for the leadership the following day!

So, whether we like the understudy taking the top job or not, they have the right, and duty, to do that job. Our system precludes any other option.



Recent posts:


A Future in Europe
Mrs May
The cult of personality
Clinton v Trump looking more likely
Dangerous stuff!
Who do you trust with your life?

Latest tweets

Today at 22:03 »
Well who'd a thunk that meeting up in person in a large group would spread #COVID19?EVERYONE WITH SOME COMMONSENS…
@sfchronicle : JUST IN: More than 40 South Bay school principals are in quarantine after being exposed to COVID-19 during an in-pe… .https://t.co/Cag5B6eEmM
Today at 21:25 »
Prat 'interviewing' another prat.
@darrengrimes_ : On the @ReasonedUK interview I conducted with Dr David Starkey:
Today at 21:23 »
@thenib @owenblacker @Lubchansky I'm interested in what was different about the fourth civil war...
Today at 21:19 »
@TomLondon6 @guardian @NewStatesman @Freedland
Today at 20:44 »
#seen.
Today at 20:37 »
By 'eck... #RedSox
@sabr : What do Babe Ruth, Monte Ward, Jim Kaat, and Dennis Eckersley all have in common? In our new #SABR Research Journal… .https://t.co/z5OUMhxUPt
Today at 16:56 »
Two down, at least one to go...
@LeanneWood : Ghislaine Maxwell has been arrested. Who is next?