AlisonW - The .com test site

This site is currently being redeveloped. Although it will work fine it will continue to look terrible for a while yet. Sorry!

2011-03-17 - 16:24:00 - by AlisonW - Topic: Tech: Security | Social | Twitter |

I have – 90 hours after submitting the ticket! – had a response from twitter support regarding the suspension of my main account there (@AlisonW). It seems that it was, in fact, the content of the tweet I partially redacted in my earlier post. The accusation was that "Your account has been suspended for posting an individuals private information such as private email address, physical address, telephone number or financial documents. ", which I found I disagreed with, so have written a reply:

Thanks for getting back to me.

I acknowledge that I did post *contact* information for someone in tweet #462080089586401 - this was (a) not confidential in any way, being a matter of public record (in the succeeding tweet #462087285460173 I detailed the online source of that information, stating "See http://www.ipo.gov.uk/domestic?domesticnum=2536161 for basis") and (b) it is not 'private' information, being a publicly-accessible business address for service of documents and not a home address. This was all part of a discussion between the original (and, as I understand it, future) user of the handle "girlgeeks" - at that time having been moved to the handle "girlgeeks_" - and this information was directed to her (for which she subsequently thanked me) though I was unable to make it a single-user reply running out of characters. She has, I have been advised, subsequently had her original handle returned.

I certainly understand the principle of maintaining all *private* information about a user of your service in a secure and confidential manner and have never and would never publish such information, either on twitter or elsewhere. If I was wrong in presuming that public information freely accessible to all (ie. without registration, fee, etc) may not be republished on twitter then my apologies for any misunderstanding.


Given that one of the great successes of Twitter has been the rapid promulgation of existing information from a wide range of websites – usually zipping around the globe via retweets – then I'm somewhat at a loss to understand their point of view of objecting to my copying some information from a public UK Government website, but hopefully my account will return shortly.



Recent posts:


A Future in Europe
Mrs May
The cult of personality
Clinton v Trump looking more likely
Dangerous stuff!
Who do you trust with your life?

Latest tweets

Yesterday at 20:49 »
@rupertg I unexpectedly got a slot for Saturday (this!) a couple of hours ago. I wasn't even intending to try again…
Yesterday at 20:47 »
@proactivepaul @jemgillam @MatthewIain86 I really remember how odd watching the film 1984 felt when I was _in_ 1984…
Yesterday at 20:37 »
@proactivepaul This is the real issue. British homes are wayyy too small (frequently smaller than legal requirement…
Yesterday at 20:32 »
@BobBurgher @MartinRemains Some of us had a #Lefax instead of the copy :-P
Yesterday at 20:31 »
@MartinRemains I still have two! (an original and a Handspring). They were truly wonderful and great form factor.
Yesterday at 20:30 »
:: as much applause as I can make in this small room without annoying too many neighbours ::
@weirb : West Brewery will do no more business with Tim Martin's Wetherspoons."We’d rather sweep the streets than do busin… .https://t.co/LgKpzgj0Rz
Yesterday at 20:28 »
@proactivepaul I'm basically retired now, so in that sense unaffected, but it used to be that I regularly worked fr…