AlisonW - The .com test site

This site is currently being redeveloped. Although it will work fine it will continue to look terrible for a while yet. Sorry!

2011-07-25 - 10:02:00 - by AlisonW - Topic: Open: Open Knowledge | Privacy |

I've been thinking a lot about why Google seem so concerned about having "real" names; what difference it could actually make to them whether, for example, someone in Hong Kong uses their chinese-script name or the romanised name they are commonly known by; why 'Skud' is not acceptable but the name nobody actually uses for her is desired so much that they prefer to have her absent entirely. What is the business case for this?

And the only answer I've come up with so far has been around the equivalent functionality elsewhere: either a Census or the Phone Book and the latter would clearly have the capability to create an income stream.

If you have a list of guaranteed "real names", and a contact method for each one of them – with the ability to uniquely target advertising – then you have a massive money-spinner.

Google started as a search engine service; now it wants to have the world as its source data.



Recent posts:


A Future in Europe
Mrs May
The cult of personality
Clinton v Trump looking more likely
Dangerous stuff!
Who do you trust with your life?

Latest tweets

Today at 20:52 »
The best form of #2A is "The Right to Bare Arms" in summer. And nothing else.
Today at 17:34 »
@AucklandTuatara "The four-times *former* champions..." :-P
Today at 16:18 »
@John_McDosh @RealSexyCyborg Strong agreement with that first line here, but if you need to explain away something…
Today at 16:16 »
:: steals for later use ::
Today at 16:16 »
@DigitalAlucard @RealSexyCyborg So what! If I had a body like hers (I want to say "still" but that ship passed a lo…
Today at 15:47 »
@John_McDosh @RealSexyCyborg And whyever should someone become a "target" (in your words) for supporting…
Today at 11:20 »
@Andrew_Adonis And like the Channel Tunnel it will still need to be built eventually.