AlisonW - The .com test site

This site is currently being redeveloped. Although it will work fine it will continue to look terrible for a while yet. Sorry!

2011-07-25 - 10:02:00 - by AlisonW - Topic: Open: Open Knowledge | Privacy |

I've been thinking a lot about why Google seem so concerned about having "real" names; what difference it could actually make to them whether, for example, someone in Hong Kong uses their chinese-script name or the romanised name they are commonly known by; why 'Skud' is not acceptable but the name nobody actually uses for her is desired so much that they prefer to have her absent entirely. What is the business case for this?

And the only answer I've come up with so far has been around the equivalent functionality elsewhere: either a Census or the Phone Book and the latter would clearly have the capability to create an income stream.

If you have a list of guaranteed "real names", and a contact method for each one of them ā€“ with the ability to uniquely target advertising ā€“ then you have a massive money-spinner.

Google started as a search engine service; now it wants to have the world as its source data.



Recent posts:


A Future in Europe
Mrs May
The cult of personality
Clinton v Trump looking more likely
Dangerous stuff!
Who do you trust with your life?

Latest tweets

Today at 01:37 »
@ClaireGreensla5 @BlokeOnWheels Ditto but the massive media support he and his acolytes get I doubt it will actually change anything. šŸ˜¢šŸ˜­
Today at 01:35 »
A 10-0 lead should be safe enough to go to sleep on, yes? #RedSox
Today at 00:28 »
ONE inningTWO homersFOUR runs scored#RedSox first inning
Today at 00:25 »
@Soxfan311 No other country needs to hold regular 'active shooter' drills for school kids. No other country daily sā€¦
  • 1
Today at 00:21 »
Heehee!
Today at 00:10 »
@TheSavBananas @RedSox No Party Animals tonight though šŸ˜¢
Today at 00:06 »
@Alheri I tried that on a desktop screen once. No way am I going to try it on this phone!