AlisonW - The .com test site

This site is currently being redeveloped. Although it will work fine it will continue to look terrible for a while yet. Sorry!

2011-01-09 - 08:26:00 - by AlisonW - Topic: Personal: Memories | Politics | Vehicles |

Over the New Year break I received a letter from the DVLA requiring me to update the photograph on my driving licence (and, of course, to pay a substantial fee for the privilege of doing so!). Although the licence last can be valid for as many as fifty years the picture must be replaced every ten, and that time has come around again for me.

And it got me to thinking about the other images of me which are around and about and which people use to recognise 'me', especially those we all now use online. When we each scan through our Twitter, Facebook, Meetup, and LinkedIn feeds we identify the messages via the icons alongside them far faster than we may look for the associated name or handle. When people change their icons – as happened some years ago when lots of baby pictures appeared and another time when plain green boxes did so – then we have to read slower or even do a double-take when we mis-recognise an icon or it becomes too similar to that of another person on our reading list.

So I'm realising that my most frequent icon – which was once my 'official photograph' in political circles – is showing its age (or rather not showing mine!) and could do with being brought more up to date. But then the 'recognition factor' debate kicks in and I ponder whether it is the right thing to do.

When a product or company changes its name, like Marathon to Snickers or Norwich Union to Aviva it can add "formerly known as" during a change-over period. When they change their logo they can put both on the packaging for a short while to help carry the positive feeling towards the old image to the new one. But something only 80 or 100 pixels wide doesn't have that possibility in practical terms; it is an all-or-nothing change and woebetide the image consultant who advises a client but then gets it wrong.

But, of course, with the online and social media whirl we are each usually our own image consultant and can only blame ourself when we screw things up. So, be prepared for a change of my image coming along. What it will be I don't yet know, though I've plenty of ideas which don't include having my face in there it cannot be denied that faces have a very strong appeal and fast recognition strength. And whatever it changes to will have to stand the test of time for a good few years.



Recent posts:


A Future in Europe
Mrs May
The cult of personality
Clinton v Trump looking more likely
Dangerous stuff!
Who do you trust with your life?

Latest tweets

Yesterday at 22:9 »
RT @LetsPlayJen :
@LetsPlayJen : I would consider dating a tory, but they've been fucking me for 10 years and its been very unsatisfying.
  • 103
Yesterday at 22:06 »
@NESN Sign... Ellsbury... WHA ?
Yesterday at 18:23 »
@BBCRealityCheck @Penteana Yet instead of stating the real figure (of around 1%) you are actually *promoting* the f…
Yesterday at 18:14 »
What happened to the other 10%? I can't believe that anyone actually _likes_ the orange fool?
@thehill : An overwhelming 90 percent of black Americans disapprove of Trump's job performance in a new poll… .https://t.co/ObsGSbWVUO
Yesterday at 18:12 »
@nuxnix Were they mates with the PM though? Did they invite him to their private island?
Yesterday at 18:00 »
@crimefish Well it's that or jump in the sea, I guess ... and ditto
Yesterday at 17:55 »
@edent Ah, thought you were on about search. No idea about alternatives to gmail (I run my own mail server...)