AlisonW - The .com test site

This site is currently being redeveloped. Although it will work fine it will continue to look terrible for a while yet. Sorry!

2009-06-18 - 23:47:00 - by AlisonW - Topic: UK-Politics: Westminster |

"Redacted".

It is everywhere today due to the 'publication' of the last four year's worth of MPs' receipted expenditure. I looked at the information for my own MP ā€“ Glenda Jackson ā€“ and found great big expanses of black where details had been 'redacted'. 'Removed to hide the real information' more like!

Thank you to the editor of The Telegraph for publishing the unexpurgated version so that we may see what the MPs were trying to hide. Clearly, whilst our Members of Parliament may wish to not have certain details easily available to the public (even though they are legally required to publish most of these same details elsewhere!) the fact that addresses ā€“ even 'loose' ones such as just the town or outbound postcode ā€“ are omitted from these records released today means that it would be nigh on impossible to show just how unacceptable some of them have been with taxpayers money.



Recent posts:


A Future in Europe
Mrs May
The cult of personality
Clinton v Trump looking more likely
Dangerous stuff!
Who do you trust with your life?

Latest tweets

Today at 01:37 »
@ClaireGreensla5 @BlokeOnWheels Ditto but the massive media support he and his acolytes get I doubt it will actually change anything. šŸ˜¢šŸ˜­
Today at 01:35 »
A 10-0 lead should be safe enough to go to sleep on, yes? #RedSox
Today at 00:28 »
ONE inningTWO homersFOUR runs scored#RedSox first inning
Today at 00:25 »
@Soxfan311 No other country needs to hold regular 'active shooter' drills for school kids. No other country daily sā€¦
  • 1
Today at 00:21 »
Heehee!
Today at 00:10 »
@TheSavBananas @RedSox No Party Animals tonight though šŸ˜¢
Today at 00:06 »
@Alheri I tried that on a desktop screen once. No way am I going to try it on this phone!