AlisonW - The .com test site

This site is currently being redeveloped. Although it will work fine it will continue to look terrible for a while yet. Sorry!

2012-02-04 - 22:16:00 - by AlisonW - Topic: Meta: Thoughts |

Yesterday I attended #BenefitsCamp , which was considering various ideas and creating option around the issues related to the UK benefits system.

I'll write elsewhere on my main topic of interest, as it has rather 'grown wings' and deserves a discussion site of its own to be better reviewed and taken forward, but one of the points I made during the event was about the name given to the field. Often seen on job advertisements – or a part of an interview process – is that matter of salary. And alongside 'salary' comes 'benefits', which might be a subsidised canteen, service discounts, pension contributions, or regular bonus payments. And the bankers have made 'bonus' a very bad word indeed.

"Benefits" are perceived as just another name for 'extras'.

So what happens when that same word is applied to payments made to those unemployed, or disabled, or injured and temporarily unable to work? Parts of the media name these payments – which provide a roof over someone's head and allow them to eat, are pretty minimal in the first place – 'benefit' in a way which makes them sound both undeserved by the recipient, and some sort of penalty to the tax-payers who provide the funding to the government.

So the next question, clearly, is what such life-sustaining payments should be called instead.



Recent posts:


A Future in Europe
Mrs May
The cult of personality
Clinton v Trump looking more likely
Dangerous stuff!
Who do you trust with your life?

Latest tweets

Yesterday at 19:41 »
@Machiavelli2018 @HS2theTruth @BarrySheerman It's designed to be able to take faster services than will initially r…
Yesterday at 19:37 »
@HS2theTruth @Machiavelli2018 @BarrySheerman Er, you do realise that Adonis isn't in government and isn't likely to…
Yesterday at 17:16 »
@BRCWCo @2dollarcasio @HS2ltd Having never travelled on either I'll accept your word on it!
Yesterday at 17:15 »
@2dollarcasio @BRCWCo @HS2ltd HS2 will, almost certainly, be same cost as existing options for the same journey, ot…
Yesterday at 17:14 »
@Machiavelli2018 @BarrySheerman @HS2theTruth Yes, because to do so would destroy the very reason for its existence.…
Yesterday at 16:10 »
There's nothing wrong with socialism - we all rely on public roads, etc - but it is very clear the #BernieIsNotBlue…
@BernieSanders : I've got news for the Republican establishment. I've got news for the Democratic establishment. They can't stop us.
Yesterday at 16:05 »
@banditman59uk cf. Original Wood Lane (Shepherds' Bush) on twopenny tube.