AlisonW - The .com test site

This site is currently being redeveloped. Although it will work fine it will continue to look terrible for a while yet. Sorry!

2016-02-17 - 21:33:57 - by AlisonW - Topic: UK-Politics: Conservative | Health |

It's often said that strikes are always about money, but might I draw your attention to something else … trust.

We each, every day, trust other people to do their jobs properly and safely. Whether they are driving the bus which takes our children to school, or the doctor who looks after us in a hospital, they each have the possibility to main or even kill if they fail to do their job properly.

And that means they get proper rest breaks, and regular sleep.

If you drive a truck or a bus the government sets limits on the maximum number of hours you can work in a day and a week, and also sets a limit of how many hours you can work over any two week (fourteen day) period.

The numbers are NINE in a day, FIFTY-SIX in a week, and NINETY in any two week period.

Now look at the government's contract with the doctors. The Telegraph tells us that "The Government says the new deal would have an absolute limit of 72 hours in any week, lower than the 91 hours that the current arrangements allow." and "Employers will be banned from scheduling any shifts over 13 hours, down from the current full shift length of 14 hours."

So currently Doctors can be ordered to work FIVE HOURS more each day than bus drivers are permitted to drive, and more IN ONE WEEK than those drivers are allowed to work in TWO!

Even with the 'new deal' the medical staff in your local hospital will still be working far more hours than is considered safe for drivers.

Who do you trust with your life?



Recent posts:


A Future in Europe
Mrs May
The cult of personality
Clinton v Trump looking more likely
Dangerous stuff!
Who do you trust with your life?

Latest tweets

Today at 00:35 »
@RoyalDocksRob @turini2 Getting planning permissions is one issue, other is governments tend to be short-sighted wh…
Yesterday at 23:26 »
Supreme Court abolishes need for Appeals courts.
@jaywillis : Here is Clarence Thomas, writing for 6 of 9 Supreme Court justices, explaining that the prospect of a federal court… https://t.co/gGEG7tmL9K
Yesterday at 23:24 »
RT @rupertg :
@DextersTechLab: Spotted somewhere in Derbyshire, the mice are happy, cats disappointed with the outcome https://t.co/tabgPfUHa1
  • 2
Yesterday at 23:21 »
Top left difficult.
Yesterday at 22:52 »
@Gerrarrdus By Jiminy!
Yesterday at 22:49 »
What will Superman do now?(Stupid decision, obviously, as not everyone has a mobile phone fully charged, especiall…
@Bogs4NY : Cutting the cord ... NYC's last public payphone is removed from service #nyc #nbc4ny
Yesterday at 22:43 »
At first I agreed with this.Then I wondered who was being referred to upon seeing the word "conscience".Can't be…
@mrjamesob : If you've spent your entire adult life lying to wives, mistresses, employers, interviewers, colleagues & voters, ly… https://t.co/eKJs2hZwOd